Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Halloween
One of my all-time favorite movies. I end up watching this multiple times a year. It's a beautifully shot movie, and the soundtrack is incredible. I love the dialog. I love how crazed Dr. Loomis is (and the look of joy on his face when he gets in his one good scare). I love Laurie, Annie and Lynda. I love Michael Myers dressing up like a ghost and putting on Bob's glasses. I love everything about this movie.
Sunday, October 20, 2013
Poltergeist
I can't remember the last time I had seen this movie. High school, I guess. Considering I graduated in 1998, that was a long time ago. I remembered the very end - what happened to the house - but that was it. Pretty much every other detail escaped me. I even forgot that Carol Anne was taken, and that's one of the central plots of the movie.
So, while I had seen this movie, it felt like I was watching it for the first time.
There were some odd goofy moments, and some of the special effects felt dated, but I thought this movie holds up pretty well. It wasn't quite as creepy as I had remembered it, but there were still a number of moments that made my skin crawl.
A solid movie. I won't wait 15+ years to watch it again.
Saturday, October 19, 2013
Trick R Treat
I've written about this movie in the past (here), so I'll keep this short. This has become essential viewing every year around Halloween. It always puts me in the Halloween mood. It has a great feel and atmosphere to it. I love this movie.
If you haven't seen these vintage pictures of people in Halloween outfits, you really need to. The schoolbus scene in this movie reminds me a lot of these. Some freaky, freaky stuff.
Thursday, October 17, 2013
You're Next
Description from Netflix:
When shy Erin joins her new
boyfriend at a family reunion to commemorate his parents’ anniversary, the
tense gathering is horrifically interrupted by a gang of masked invaders who
brutalize the celebrants…until someone starts fighting back.
My thoughts:
Going to the dollar theater by yourself is always a ton of
fun. I highly recommend it.
I really liked this.
It had a cool 80s slasher vibe to it, due in no small part to the
stellar synth soundtrack. The soundtrack
really set the mood for this movie. The
filmmakers also did a great job at using silence at times to ratchet up the
tension.
It would be easy to compare this to The Strangers, and I suppose there’s a bit of that in here, mainly
because it’s a home invasion movie with masks.
But, as I pointed out above, it looks and feels more like an 80s
slasher. This really felt more like Friday the 13th or Halloween than The Strangers.
But even that comparison isn’t overly accurate. Erin was far
more competent at fighting back than the majority of final girls in those
movies. Erin
is a fighter. She was raised as a
survivalist. She has no qualms with
picking up a meat tenderizer and raining down holy hell on someone twice her
size. This movie won’t rank high on the
list of best slashers ever, but Erin should
rank pretty high on the list of all-time survivor girls. She’s scrappy. She’s nasty.
She’s resourceful. And she’s
responsible for one of the best kills I’ve seen in recent memory.
Without getting too slap-sticky, this has a lot of really
funny moments (provided the gruesome deaths of some main characters is
something you find amusing, which I do).
It was never goofy, but there were quite a few laugh-out-loud funny
moments.
One of those funny moments was seeing a man in a sheep mask
walk around with a crossbow. I’m not
even sure it was supposed to be funny, but it killed me.
This was a really bloody slasher movie. It earned its R rating. And it had a terrific ending. I’m already looking forward to watching it
again. It was a really fun time.
Also, Ti West is in this movie, and he gets killed off
really early. I could watch Ti West get
killed a thousand times. That’s how much
I hated The Innkeepers.
Sunday, October 13, 2013
The Orphan Killer
Description from IMDB:
Marcus Miller is a serial murderer hellbent on
teaching his estranged sister Audrey what it means to have family loyalty. His
lessons are taught in massive doses of vulgar and unimaginable pain. Throughout
her brutal torture we learn that Marcus is not the only Miller with Killer in
the bloodline as Audrey proves to be a formidable adversary.Yet another movie I didn't know much about before I started it. I knew it was a slasher. And that's about all I knew.
Because of this, it took me a little while to settle in. It's not a good movie in the traditional sense. The lighting is terrible. The acting is comically bad with most of the characters (I thought Diane Foster did a good job, but no one else stood out as particularly good). The music is awful. The story is decent, but nothing special. I got the feeling that the filmmakers thought they were creating a great backstory of this killer, but it really just seemed like they were trying too hard.
The music was the main sticking point for me. With very few exceptions, the soundtrack was just a bunch of terribly thrown-together metal songs. There was no sense of setting a mood. No sense of trying to match the music with the action on the screen. It was as if the filmmakers just said, "There's a chase scene. Throw on some metal. He's killing someone. Throw on some metal." As I mentioned, it never fit with the scene, and it was usually louder than it had any reason to be. It was incredibly distracting, and also seemed pretty lazy on the part of the filmmakers.
Some scenes also seemed to be ripped directly from Rob Zombie's Halloween films, but without any of the visual style that Zombie brought to those.
But, after a while, I settled in and found that I was enjoying it. No, it wasn't good. But, when viewing it as a kind of grindhouse movie, it made a lot more sense. It was incredibly violent. When there was blood (which was often), it spewed forth like a fountain. It pooled on the floor. It splattered on the camera (which made no sense, but whatever). The blood splatter was inconsistent from scene-to-scene.
There was also some gratuitous nudity.
All of that just kind of added to the grindhouse charm of it. I'm not sure if that's what the filmmakers were going for, but, if they were, they pulled it off pretty well.
I also really enjoyed seeing a psychopathic child wearing a mask. That's always fun.
It wasn't a great movie, but it was a pretty fun movie.
Rating: 3.5/5
Saturday, October 12, 2013
Escape From Tomorrow
Description from IMDB:
In a world of fake castles and anthropomorphic rodents, an
epic battle begins when an unemployed father's sanity is challenged by a chance
encounter with two underage girls on holiday.
Before I talk about this, let's watch the trailer again. Because the trailer is amazing.
You know what that looks like? It looks like a terrific psychological horror movie filmed (illegally) in Disney World. You can read what I said about it the first time I saw the trailer here.
I was excited. You were excited. I tried to temper my expectations, but I couldn't help myself. I mean, look at that trailer? For someone who went to Disney World quite a few times as a child, I couldn't help but be excited for this.
Sadly, it wasn't very good. Most of the great moments can be found right there in the trailer. What I thought would be a movie about a man slowly losing his mind at Disney World (complete with lots of horrifying takes on familiar images) turned out to be a movie about a married man with two children lusting after every woman he happened to cross paths with. Underage French girls. A nurse. A fallen Disney princess. Current Disney princesses.
And that is what drove the story forward. They easily could have made this movie revolve around horrific Disney imagery, but instead chose to drive the story based on the libido of a middle-aged man. Not the best choice.
Some of the imagery was great. The fact that it was shot in black and white really helped. The acting may not have been great, but it wasn't terrible. I loved the music. It alternated between whimsical and dark, and it fit the mood of the film very well.
There was a decent amount of green screen, and it was terrible. However, since they shot the bulk of the movie on location at Disney World, any added shots (as well as any scripted scenes featuring more than a couple of people) needed to be filmed in green screen. It looked awful. But, given the limitations of the film, I give the green screen a bit of a pass. It was distracting, but they had to work with the limitations they set for themselves. It was bad, but not the worst part of the movie.
Within the next week, I'm sure to have some better formulate thoughts and opinions on this. As it stands now, I'm just disappointed. And tired. But mostly disappointed.
Rating: 1.5/5
Labels:
2010s,
Disney,
Escape From Tomorrow,
Psychological Horror
Sunday, October 6, 2013
Frankenstein's Army
It's that time of year again. The time when I try to watch as many horror movies as my little eyes can handle. Instead of my usual, long-winded reviews, I'm going to just post a few thoughts about each movie I watch. That means I will likely be posting about movies I've seen before. So, for the next month, this blog will become my own personal viewing log. You're welcome.
Description from Netflix:
As they push into Germany near the end of World War II, Russian troops discover that the Nazis have used the research scientist Victor Frankenstein to create monstrous new soldiers that are pieced together from body parts of the dead.
Here is a list of things I knew about this movie before I started it:
1. Good creature design
2. World War II
That's it. That's the sum of my knowledge about this movie. Which is good, I guess. I didn't really have any expectations going in.
Here's something I didn't know that would have been useful. It's a found footage movie.
I hoped this would be good. I'm a sucker for horror movies set in different periods (at least, I think I am. I often find that I like the idea of these movies better than I actually like the movie). And I love good creature design. This should have been right up my alley.
Sadly, it was not. It was pretty boring, and I wasn't overly impressed with the creature effects. They pretty much looked like rejects from Hellboy. Some of them looked pretty cool, but, if they were planning on driving interest in the movie based on that, they failed horribly.
There really weren't any likable characters, either. It's hard to really get too invested in a movie when there aren't any characters to sympathize with.
The first-person style was really distracting. These kinds of movies are pretty hit-and-miss for me. When done well, found footage movies can be really good, and the style can add a lot to the movie. When done poorly, they're extremely distracting to the story. This was the latter.
I normally don't get too tied up in the camera logic of these movies. Whether a person is filming under strange circumstances makes very little difference to me. But this one was really obnoxious. There were a number of times when the cameraman was running from a monster, dropped the camera, and took time to pick it up, hold it back up to his face, and film as he ran. I understand needing to do this to keep showing things, but it doesn't make any sense here. Again, I normally don't have these issues, but it was impossible to ignore here.
This was a movie that started really slow, and, even when it picked up, never really held my interest.
Rating: 1.5/5
Description from Netflix:
As they push into Germany near the end of World War II, Russian troops discover that the Nazis have used the research scientist Victor Frankenstein to create monstrous new soldiers that are pieced together from body parts of the dead.
Here is a list of things I knew about this movie before I started it:
1. Good creature design
2. World War II
That's it. That's the sum of my knowledge about this movie. Which is good, I guess. I didn't really have any expectations going in.
Here's something I didn't know that would have been useful. It's a found footage movie.
I hoped this would be good. I'm a sucker for horror movies set in different periods (at least, I think I am. I often find that I like the idea of these movies better than I actually like the movie). And I love good creature design. This should have been right up my alley.
Sadly, it was not. It was pretty boring, and I wasn't overly impressed with the creature effects. They pretty much looked like rejects from Hellboy. Some of them looked pretty cool, but, if they were planning on driving interest in the movie based on that, they failed horribly.
There really weren't any likable characters, either. It's hard to really get too invested in a movie when there aren't any characters to sympathize with.
The first-person style was really distracting. These kinds of movies are pretty hit-and-miss for me. When done well, found footage movies can be really good, and the style can add a lot to the movie. When done poorly, they're extremely distracting to the story. This was the latter.
I normally don't get too tied up in the camera logic of these movies. Whether a person is filming under strange circumstances makes very little difference to me. But this one was really obnoxious. There were a number of times when the cameraman was running from a monster, dropped the camera, and took time to pick it up, hold it back up to his face, and film as he ran. I understand needing to do this to keep showing things, but it doesn't make any sense here. Again, I normally don't have these issues, but it was impossible to ignore here.
This was a movie that started really slow, and, even when it picked up, never really held my interest.
Rating: 1.5/5
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






