Sunday, October 14, 2012

The Sentinel


Description from Netflix:
Model Alison Parker gets a great deal on a Brooklyn, NY apartment - but there's just one catch: it's also the gateway to Hell, and she's on the invite list.  Universal's answer to The Exorcist features a stellar supporting cast.

Notable actors: Christopher Walken, Jeff Goldblum, Chris Sarandon, Ava Gardner, Burgess Meredith, Jerry Orbach, Beverly D'Angelo, Tom Berenger

My thoughts:
First of all, that's a lot of famous people.  Granted, they didn't all have large roles (for instance, Jeff Goldblum was barely in it, and Christopher Walken only had 1 or 2 lines), but it's a pretty impressive cast.  That's without even mentioning the main girl, played by Cristina Raines.  I had never seen her in anything before, but she did a great job.  I wish I had seen her in something before.


The description calls it "Universal's answer to The Exorcist", but that doesn't seem quite right.  If anything, the mood felt more like Rosemary's Baby than anything.  Except I enjoyed it more than Rosemary's Baby, because it moved along at a better pace.
It had a really good atmosphere, and there was a sense of mystery that drove the movie.  I could kind of sense where the movie was going, but it took a much different path than I thought it would.

Chris Sarandon and his awesome mustache

I watched this movie because Ricky Butler talks about it in The Burbs, and I realized I had never seen it.  Besides that reference, I didn't know too much about it.  It was well worth a watch.  It really felt more like a mystery than a horror movie, but the last 10 minutes were legitimately creepy.
I had a few problems with the ending, which I will talk about here.  Even though this came out in 1977, I'm still going to throw a "spoiler alert" on it.

[SPOILER]
Alison was a model, and a pretty high-profile on at that.  She was in dozens of print ads, and quite a few television ads, including one that seemed to be getting quite a bit of air time recently.  Pretty much everyone she met in the movie recognized her.  Yet, at the end of the movie, she becomes the sentinel to guard against the gates of Hell, and no one missed her?  Surely someone would have been looking for her?  Her best friend?  Her employers?  I just don't believe that a popular model can just drop off the face of the Earth without anyone looking for her.
[END SPOILER]


If you haven't seen this yet, I recommend that you check it out.  It's currently on Netflix Instant.

Rating: 4/5

Christopher Walken: Demon Detective

Saturday, October 13, 2012

Sinister


Description from Netflix:
After moving to a new town, a true-crime writer discovers a cache of videotapes depicting brutal murders that took place in the very house he just bought.  As he tries to solve the mystery behind the crimes, a sinister force threatens his own family.

Notable actors: Ethan Hawke, Fred Dalton Thomas

My thoughts:
We went to see this in the theater last night.  I saw a preview for it before Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, and it looked really creepy.  So I've been looking forward to this for a long time.



Through the first half, I was afraid that it was going to turn into Insidious.  It had the same kind of feel, so I just assumed it was going to hit a point that just lost me.  I assumed it was going to show the monster for too long and he was going to look ridiculous, or that there would be some hokey explanation for it.  But that point never hit.
There was a scene a little more than an hour in that seemed a little goofy and out of place, but it didn't kill the movie.  I was already significantly invested by that point, and it didn't completely derail the movie.


This movie was pretty creepy, but it was really more unsettling than anything.  We sit with Ellison Oswalt (Ethan Hawke's character) as he watches films that show the murder of a series of families.  The movie actually opens with a family of 4 being hung from a tree.  It was pretty disturbing, and definitely helped to set the stage for the rest of the movie.


It was pretty creepy throughout.  It was a bit slow at times, but I was never bored.  Even in those slow times, I was ready for something to happen at any time, so I was always on edge.  They did a great job at setting an atmosphere of dread, and keeping it throughout the entire film.  In less skilled hands, this movie could easily have been very boring.  As it is, I thought this was very well done.
There was even a character brought in for comic relief that I really enjoyed.  It was a nice break from the crushing dread, but it didn't completely destroy the mood of the movie.


I had couple issues with the movie (minor plot holes, mainly), and I wasn't crazy about the ending.  But, overall, I really liked this movie.  Very creepy.  Very tense.  Very well done.

Rating: 4.5/5

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

What I'm Watching: 10/9/12


Description from Netflix:
An American in Tokyo uncovers a horrific curse that is claiming the lives of all who enter a mysterious house.  A creepy spirit with a tragic past is spreading the deadly evil force in this English-language remake of the Japanese horror film Ju-On.

Notable actors: Sarah Michelle Gellar, Bill Pullman, Clea DuVall, Ted Raimi, Matthew Mapother

My thoughts:
I had never seen this movie before.  Combine that with my love of Sarah Michelle Gellar - and the fact that I saw The Grudge 2 in the theater - and I figured I was due.


I thought it was okay.  Not great.  Maybe I'm just watching it too late.  Perhaps it would have been terrifying if I had seen it back in 2004.  But, by this point, I've seen a lot of movies in this vein, and they're all roughly the same.  There were a few unsettling moments in this movie (the girl climbing all herky-jerky down the stairs creeped me out a little bit), but, for the most part, it didn't really draw me in.  I never really felt like I was on the edge of my seat.
I remember watching The Ring for the first time and being utterly terrified.  Would I have felt that way about this movie when it came out?  It's impossible to say.  Although I do plan on rewatching The Ring in the not-too-distant future, so we'll see how I feel about that one now.


It wasn't bad, but I wouldn't rank this as a "don't miss" movie or anything like that.  Of course, I don't seem to remember anyone telling me that it was a "don't miss" movie, so maybe I just thought it was going to be better than it was.
It was better than Dark Water.  I don't know what that's worth, but it was definitely better than Dark Water.

Rating: 3/5

Saturday, October 6, 2012

What I'm Watching: 10/5/12 - Part II


The description from Netflix:
A small-town disc jockey and an embittered Texas Ranger team up to put an end to the murderous affairs of the Sawyer family in this sequel to the cult favorite.  The ranger, whose son was killed in the first movie, is determined to get revenge, and the DJ has a tape that may be vital to his search.  The pair follows the killers' trail to a slaughterhouse underneath an abandoned amusement park, which has become the Sawyer family hideout.

Notable actors: Dennis Hopper, Bill Moseley

My thoughts:
One point of contention with the Netflix description: The Texas Ranger ("Lefty") was the uncle of the Hardestys, not their father.
I had never seen this before, and I honestly didn't even know much about it.  It was definitely different from the original.  Much goofier, while still being really gory and pretty unsettling.  There were parts that drug on for too long, but, overall, I really liked it.
Also, we got an all-time great final girl in Stretch.  Sure, she made a handful of dumb decisions, but she went through a lot of torture, and a lot of messed up stuff (like wearing her friend's face), and she came out on top.  Did she lose her mind a bit at the end?  Probably.  But she fought hard and she survived, and that's what makes a good final girl.


Rating: 4/5

Friday, October 5, 2012

What I'm Watching: 10/5/12


The description from Netflix:
When secretive new neighbors move in next door, suburbanite Ray Peterson and his friends let their paranoia get the best of them as they start to suspect the newcomers of evildoings and commence an investigation.  But it's hardly how Ray, who prefers drinking beer, reading his newspaper and watching a ball game on the tube expected to spend his vacation.

Notable actors: Tom Hanks, Carrie Fisher, Bruce Dern, Corey Feldman, Courtney Gains

First of all, that description is ridiculous.

Second of all, this movie is amazing.  I have seen this dozens of times, and I love it a little more every time.  One of my all-time favorite movies.

Rating: 5/5

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

What I'm Watching: 10/3/12

As I have previously mentioned, I watch a lot of movies, but I don't get around to reviewing all of them.  So, as a way to keep everyone (my 2 readers) updated on what I'm watching, I thought I would just post the cover.  No thoughts or anything: not yet, anyway.  So this will basically become my viewing journal.

If, by chance, there are people reading this who see a cover and say, "I would like to know more about that movie.  I wish he would review it," just leave me a comment and let me know.  It may inspire me to write a little more often.

With that out of the way, here is what I'm watching tonight:


The description from Netflix:
A decade after the Civil War, Edward Young returns home from a hunting trip to find that his son is missing and his wife has become a zombie.  Edward sets out to find his song among the hordes of the walking dead and documents his story in a book.

V/H/S



I have run into a recurring problem with found footage movies: they seem to start off pretty slow.  It’s a way to set the stage a little bit; to make it feel a bit more like real life.  The viewer gets to know the main characters a little better in the downtime.  Quarantine starts off with 10-15 minutes of Angela interviewing firemen.  It lulls you into a certain sense of security/boredom.  It also allows us to see Angela in her everyday life.  “She’s just like us.”  Well…not exactly like us, but you get the feeling that she’s a normal person.
The good found footage movies do this well, and use this device to their advantage.  You feel a better connection to the character.  You feel more invested in their well-being.  The first 15 minutes being a little slow doesn’t really matter in the long-run.


This is my main problem with V/H/S, an anthology movie featuring 4 short films inside of a wraparound story.  The entire movie clocks in at just under two hours, which would be fine if it were one story.  But it’s not.  It’s five stories.  And each one has the set-up that I just talked about.  Having an extended period of dead time to start your movie doesn’t kill it if it’s 90+ minutes long.  But, if you’re making a film of roughly 15 minutes, you can’t have 10 minutes of boring set-up.  That doesn’t make it interesting.  It just makes it boring.

There’s another thing that kind of kills this movie: there really aren’t any likable characters.  There are a handful of characters that I didn’t actively hate, but not too many.  I despised the vast majority of these characters.  I don’t mean that in a, “they were despicable and I couldn’t relate to them” kind of way.  I mean that in a “they grated on my nerves” kind of way.  That’s the major difference in the characters in this movie and the characters in Trick R Treat.  Trick R Treat was filled with terrible people, but they were at least tolerable.  I wanted to reach through the screen and punch most of the characters in V/H/S.

Let’s get to a short breakdown of each story, starting with the wraparound.

“Tape 56” [Director: Adam Wingard]


A few friends are hired by an unknown person to break into a house and steal a specific VHS tape from an old man.  We don’t know much about these guys, except for the fact that they make money by running around, lifting girl’s shirts up, filming it, and selling it to porn sites.  They also enjoy vandalism (shocking, I know).  Also, I hate all of them.
They go into the house and find that the owner is dead.  So they take their sweet time picking through his library of VHS tapes.  They watch some of the tapes to try to figure out which one they’re supposed to grab (as opposed to just taking all of them and sorting it out later, which would have made entirely too much sense).  The short films that we see are the VHS tapes that they are viewing.
We catch glimpses of weird things in the house between the films.  A couple of the guys disappear.  Something is moving around in the house.  The dead man disappears from the chair he was sitting in, only to reappear a little later.  And so on.

Why is there so much antiquated media/facial hair in this house?!

The verdict: I hated this.  The characters were all ridiculously obnoxious, and I was openly rooting for them to die.

“Amateur Night” [Director: David Bruckner]


Three guys (Shane, Patrick & Clint) hit the town in search of sex.  Lots of sex.  One of them (Clint) has glasses with a camera installed in them, so he can record all the events of the night.  (It’s worth noting that Clint looks like Ben Folds.)

Time to CRUSH the suburbs, brah

They go to bars, drink, meet girls, and get kicked out of said bars.  One of the women they meet is a strange girl named Lily.  She’s kind of cute, but extremely pale, and her eyes look a little too big for her face.  She’s a little skittish, but she keeps getting close to Clint’s face (thus, the camera) and mouthing the words “I like you.”

"I like you, too.  Please stop looking like a caged animal."

The three guys take two girls (Lisa and the aforementioned Lily) back to their room.  Clint was going to hook up with Lily, Shane was going to hook up with Lisa, and Patrick was going to sit on the couch in the hotel room and laugh like a hyena.  Lisa falls asleep, so Shane decides to hook up with Lily instead, because no one cares about Clint or his stupid feelings.

"I like...AIIIIIIEEEEEEE!!!!"

But, as we’ve already guessed, Lily is some kind of night creature.  A vampire, most likely.  A split-faced vampire.

The night takes a turn from there.

The no-pants-dance.  But with fangs.

The verdict: I didn’t love it.  The “twist” was telegraphed from very early on.  Also, I hated the three main characters.  I guess Clint wasn’t terrible, but Shane and Patrick were insufferable.

“Second Honeymoon”  [Director: Ti West]


A married couple (Sam and Stephanie) decide to take a road trip out West for their second honeymoon.  They seem happy and in love.  They see the sights. They have fun on their drives.  And so on.

They also get their fortunes told by an old-timey prospectin' machine

One night, in their hotel room, a woman comes to the door and asks them for a ride in the morning.  They decline.
Later that night, the camera turns on, and it’s obvious that it’s the woman from earlier.  She steals $100 from Sam’s wallet, opens a switchblade, and softly touches Stephanie with it.


Sam and Stephanie wake up the next morning none-the-wiser, except for Sam accusing Stephanie of stealing his money.

Smile for the camera

The verdict: There’s a little payoff at the end, but it’s entirely too small to make up for the rest of the film.  95% of this film is watching a happily married couple taking a road trip.  The ending (which wasn’t even that great) doesn’t make up for all the boring stuff.

“Tuesday the 17th” [Director: Glenn McQuaid]


Four friends (Wendy, Joey, “Spider” & Samantha) head into the woods of Wendy’s hometown.  She says they’re going to a cabin she used to visit as a kid.  As they walk through the woods, Wendy tells them stories about a trip she took with friends, and the accidents they had.  As she tells them these stories, the camera has flashes that show dead bodies.  At some point during the walk, Wendy stops, looks into the camera, and says something to the effect of, “You’re all going to die.”

But she says it in a really adorable way

She tells them a story of a serial killer that stalked the woods, killing people.  How he killed her friends.  How he has supernatural powers that allow him to not show up on the camera.  How she brought all of them there as bait, because she was going to kill him.


And sure enough, he shows up and begins to pick them off.  And, true to the story, he only shows up on camera as a technical glitch.

There he is: all glitchy and not-at-all terrifying

The verdict: I didn’t really hate these characters, but there just wasn’t enough about them to like.  There was nothing to them.  And, as in the last film, the payoff just wasn’t worth it.  This wasn’t Jason stalking the teens of Camp Crystal Lake.  This was a blurry, tech-riddled blob shambling through the forest and killing college kids in a very quick and pretty non-interesting fashion. 

“The Sick Thing That Happened to Emily When She Was Younger” [Director: Joe Swanberg]


Emily and James are dating, and they talk often over video chat.  He lives in another state, and is studying to be a doctor.  Their chats are centered around the strange bump on her arm, and the strange happenings in her apartment.  Footsteps by the door, bumps in the night, etc.  She’s convinced that her apartment is haunted.  While chatting one night, a ghost-like figure runs into the room and slams the door. 
So it definitely appears that her apartment is haunted.
And she still has this strange bump on her arm.

Ghost child!

During one of their chats, Emily begins digging into her arm with a knife, trying to get the bump out.  James is concerned, and tells her she needs to not do that anymore.

I can’t really go too much further without spoiling the ending.

The verdict: I liked it.  I didn’t love it, but it felt like a Twilight Zone episode.  Definitely the best film in this collection.

“10/31/98” [Director: Radio Silence]


Four friends (Chad, Matt, Tyler & Paul) head out for a Halloween party.  When they get there, they don’t find anyone in the house, but there are some weird things going on in the house.  They assume that the owner set it up as a haunted house attraction.


They hear chanting coming from the attic, so they go up and find a woman tied up and a group of men beating her.  They decide to rescue her, so they cut her down and run out of the house.  As they escape, the house gets stranger.  Hands grab at them from the walls.  Chairs and tables float in the air and fly towards the escapees.


They get the girl in the car and drive off.  But things are not quite as black and white as they had assumed.


The verdict: Not bad.  It moved along pretty quickly, but it never really drew me in.  Still, it was fairly enjoyable.

Here is my ranking, in order of how much I enjoyed them:
  1. The Sick Thing That Happened to Emily When She Was Younger
  2. 10/31/98
  3. Tuesday the 17th
  4. Tape 56
  5. Amateur Night
Overall, I didn’t really like this.  It’s was pretty plodding and boring for the most part, and I didn’t like many of the characters.  And there weren’t nearly enough good parts to counteract the bad ones.  Even my favorite film was pretty boring for the most part.  It was just less boring than the other films.


I had one major issue with the film as a whole: as far as I know, this was supposed to take place in modern times.  At least, I don’t remember them saying when it took place (the only date I remember was in “10/31/98”).  So, if this did take place during modern times, why was everyone using VHS?  I get that it wouldn’t have the same feel if it was called iMovie or something, but the rampant use of VHS was baffling to me.

I also get that the ending didn’t really matter too much, but it still left me with questions.   Did they find the tape they were looking for?  How were they supposed to know if they found it?  None of them seemed to know anything beyond, “We need to find a tape,” so how would they know if they found it?  I go back to my earlier point: why not just grab all the tapes and leave?  Why stay in the house and watch all of them?  It makes no sense.  I guess I’ll just have to wait for V/H/S 2.

V/H/S II: Lost in Yonkers

I had a thought towards the end of the movie that helped me to explain the widespread use of VHS.  At least, it makes sense in my mind.
This movie does not take place in our world.  This movie takes place in an alternate reality.
Every film except “Second Honeymoon” involves supernatural events.  And not small supernatural events, either.  Yes, these could take place in our world, but that’s a pretty big leap.  To try to get me to believe in vampires, glitchy serial killers, and whatever-the-devil-happens in “The Sick Thing” is a pretty bold move.  And I believe in aliens and ghosts, so it’s not like I’m coming from some position of complete unbelief in the supernatural.
So perhaps this film takes place in an alternate universe.  A universe that, for one reason or another, technology didn’t advance quite as fast as it has here.  I realize it’s a leap, but believing that the events of this movie take place in our reality is also a pretty big leap.

Just a nice picture of non-dead friends

But that might not be accurate.  After all, they have glasses that record in “Amateur Night”.  So why do they record to VHS?  And why is the video chat of “The Strange Thing” on VHS?  Wouldn’t that all be digital?  Am I supposed to believe that someone converted a digital file to a VHS tape?  For what purpose?
As you can see, I have a lot of questions about the central tenent of this film.


One final note: when I was searching for pictures for this review, I found that the pictures made the movie look a lot better than it was.  Don’t be deceived by these pictures: the movie was not very good.

Rating: 2/5